[LinuxPPS] 2.6.22...
Udo van den Heuvel
udovdh at xs4all.nl
Sun Jul 29 19:14:16 CEST 2007
Udo van den Heuvel wrote:
> Udo van den Heuvel wrote:
>> Ever since running 2.6.22 patches with the 2.6.22-ter patch my ntpd sees
>> no PPS sources anymore.
>> Any ideas?
>
> Building ntpd using the info at
> http://wiki.enneenne.com/index.php/LinuxPPS_support#Compiling_the_code
> yields:
(cut)
I found an error!
The wiki says:
then we need to add the file ppstime.h under the directory /usr/include,
you can do it by using the command:
giometti at zaigor:/usr/include# ln -s /lib/modules/$(uname
-r)/build/Documentation/pps/ppstime.h .
where my pps dir contains:
[udo at epia ~]$ cd /usr/src/linux/Documentation/pps
[udo at epia pps]$ ls -al
total 52
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2007-07-29 18:47 .
drwxr-xr-x 65 root root 8192 2007-07-29 12:08 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4171 2007-07-29 16:04 .depend
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 500 2007-07-29 12:08 Makefile
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1167 2007-07-29 12:08 ppsctl.c
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4869 2007-07-29 12:08 ppstest.c
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 7249 2007-07-29 12:08 pps.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6487 2007-07-29 12:08 timepps.h
So timepps.h versus ppstime.h?
Which one is right?
More information about the LinuxPPS
mailing list