[LinuxPPS] [PATCHv3 12/16] ntp: add hardpps implementation

Felix Joussein felix.joussein at gmx.at
Tue Oct 5 13:51:24 CEST 2010


regarding the ntptime output:

The PPSKit statuscode was 0x2107 (PLL,PPSFREQ,PPSSIGNAL,PPSTIME,NANO)

So what's wrong here?

Thank you!

Felix

Am 2010-10-04 18:02, schrieb Reg Clemens:
> Just a question about your compiles w/o the pps.h .
>
> All of the programs
> 	ppsapitest8.c (the source I gave you)
> 	refclock_atom.c
> 	refclock_jupiter.c
> 	refclock_mx4200.c
> 	refclock_nmea.c
> 	refclock_oncore.c
> 	refclock_parse.c
> 	refclock_ripencc.c
> 	refclock_wwvb.c
>
> have an include ppsapi_timepps.h in them.
> This is just a silly stack of #ifdef's to look several places for the actual
> timepps.h .
>
> But then timepps.h includes pps.h from /usr/include/linux/pps.h .
>
> So, I dont understand how you could have had a clean compile of either my
> ppsapitest8.c
> nor atom.c / parse.c without it.
>
> The 'new' pps.h adds a define for PPS_KC_BIND , which is needed in the
> static __inline at the very end of timepps.h .
>
> Just a question, not a solution to your problem.
>
>


_______________________________________________
LinuxPPS mailing list
LinuxPPS at ml.enneenne.com
http://ml.enneenne.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxpps
Wiki: http://wiki.enneenne.com/index.php/LinuxPPS_support





More information about the LinuxPPS mailing list