[LinuxPPS] Any Updates on that issue [PATCHv3 12/16] ntp: add hardpps implementation

[Venu Gopal]

Dear Folks,

I didn't know what to do when I saw similar behavior with the latest
LinuxPPS
patches. I scratched my head for almost a month andb started putting debug
statements in the NTP code and found that hardpps() is not implemented.

I was doing a big mistake :-). Though I had the latest kernel from
Alexander's
github, which Ihar happen to download just before the repo was not
available.
And unfortunately the pps-tools which were required from the repo were
missing
and I was experimenting with the old timepps.h header (with no hardpps).

Only two weeks back I realized this and raised a trouble ticket on github,
and
they were kind enough to make the repo available since then. So do download
the pps-tools and the kernel from the Alexander's github repo.

Thanks,
_Venu

On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Alexander Gordeev <lasaine at lvk.cs.msu.su>wrote:

> В Fri, 08 Oct 2010 18:26:59 +0200
> Udo van den Heuvel <udovdh at xs4all.nl> пишет:
>
> > On 2010-10-08 18:19, Felix Joussein wrote:
> > > Maybe this timepps could become part of linuxpps?
> >
> > userland versus kernel?
>
> I think it should be a part of pps-tools. I've mostly debianized it, so
> there should be pps-dev and pps-tools packages in Debian. pps-dev will
> ship timepps.h only. :) Other systems can do the same thing.
>
> > > At least I would mention it on the wiki as long as it's not officially
> > > released!
> >
> > I'll have a try to make it chapter on the wiki.
>
> Yes, it would be very nice!
>
> --
>   Alexander
>
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxPPS mailing list
> LinuxPPS at ml.enneenne.com
> http://ml.enneenne.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxpps
> Wiki: http://wiki.enneenne.com/index.php/LinuxPPS_support
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://ml.enneenne.com/pipermail/linuxpps/attachments/20101010/ab392b5c/attachment.htm