[LinuxPPS] Recommendation / Re: Stats & architectures

Remco den Besten besten at gmail.com
Thu Mar 13 15:23:40 CET 2008


Rodolfo wrote:

> I didn't implement HARDPPS simply because I didn't need it. However
> patches are welcomed! :)
>
> I suppose you shouldn't need to much efforts in getting the HARDPPS
> support from Ulrich Windl's code and move it into LinuxPPS.

I believe that the Ulrich Windl patches included nanosecond precision while
LinuxPPS is at the microsecond level.

Is it possible to implement this nanosecond precision in conjunction
with LinuxPPS?





More information about the LinuxPPS mailing list